Hey, Cobblestone,
Kay and I are back from some travels that took us to the
Carolinas. As you might imagine, I put together a portable library, and yes, it
outweighed any other single container we packed. In the Periodicals section
were several newspapers I hadn’t read at home. (The carrier and I have a tacit
arrangement: he brings the paper late; I read it even later; it seems to be the
best we can do.) Those papers had a particular job. For years I’ve hoped to
find a newsfeed without a heavy bias toward one extreme or another. No luck so
far. I’ve asked some of the newsiest people I know, and they’ve made some
earnest suggestions, but every source I’ve checked has been – sure enough –
large on commentary and small on reporting. Maybe it’s the cynical streak in
me, but I can smell an editorial slant from a mile off. Those five or six
editions of the Journal-News I had
packed were part of an experiment, the hypothesis of which could be stated like
so: The Lord has a better purpose for news reporting than I’ve imagined up to
this point.
Though I’ve been away I haven’t stopped thinking about the
Three R’s series, and our mission as little-r redeemers, cooperating with the
capital-R Redeemer who redeemed us, to reconcile creation and humanity to himself.
As Christians – being conformed to the
image of (God’s) Son (Romans 8:29) – our heartiest efforts will be at the
points where culture and faith intersect. Since news pervades the lives of
Christian and non-Christian alike, it would qualify as one of those points. Running
news through the grid of the Three R’s – Receive as all good, Reject as all
bad, or Redeem something inherently good from whatever not-good purposes it may
have been put to – what do we find?
In the Information Age, differing viewpoints can be had by
the millions in a split second. It’s not wise, or even possible, to Receive
them all as good and true. And if you picked one, or a small handful, someone
would be along (in a split second) to say you’re an idiot for doing so. Now the
challenge is to figure out whether you’re an idiot, and viewpoints on that
topic can also be had by the millions. Let’s give Receive a tender pat on the
head and set it aside as not an option.
How about Reject? Well, I tried it. For several straight
months, I went news-less. During March, April, and the first half of May 2020,
I had checked the news several times a day. After about six weeks I could have
written the copy for the reporters – from the previous day’s copy and the day
before that. So I checked out; surely there would be something better to do
with the same amount of time. Right away I started missing news items I needed
to know about. It got to where I could hardly contribute to a relevant
conversation. In the current reality, where connectedness is a very real
expectation, I doubt any of us could afford to Reject news altogether.
Maybe the Lord could use that stack of newspapers to point me
toward Redeeming the reporting efforts that had gone into them. I started with
a prayer: “Father, please show me a better purpose for the news than I’ve seen
so far.”
Right away I read about the Christian missionaries who had
been taken hostage in Haiti. My first thought was, “Obviously, this is a job
for Special Ops.” But that thought was unproductive. Why? Because I’m not the
one who decides whether Special Ops will do this job. Well then, is there a
prayer to be prayed? Yes: “Father, let today be the day you deliver the
hostages in Haiti.” Bingo. I thought I’d been reading a report on an
international incident with potentially dire consequences, and it was indeed that.
But at the core, I was looking at a prayer-starter.
Were there any more prayers to offer up? Definitely.
Gathering more reports, I learned that all over Haiti people were being
snatched up, many of them children, by any gang members who thought they could
collect any amount of ransom at all. “O, Lord, deliver the people of Haiti from
gang violence, especially this scourge of kidnapping.” And how about the gang
members? “Jesus, redeem the gang members – deliver them from their past and establish
a future with God as their Father.” Turns out there have been dozens of
different but related prayers to pray into this situation. And yes, I’ve prayed
for the people who do have to decide whether Special Ops will be involved.
In our Bible reading plan, yesterday was a day to read a
whole Bible book: Obadiah (good thing it’s only one chapter!). From the middle
of the first verse, catch this singular phrase:
We have heard a report
from the LORD…
Yes, indeed we have – and we keep on hearing reports from the
Lord, in Scripture and by the leading of the Holy Spirit. Question is, will we
recognize them as such? Sure, many news reports won’t concern us, and there’s
no need burdening our consciousness with those. But I would suggest that the
great majority of items we come in contact with are prayer-starters.
Looking closely, we can identify at least three things that
“praying into the news” can accomplish. First and best, it can move the heart
of God to rectify unjust situations. Next, by praying Spirit-led prayers we can
sort truth from untruth, since, according to Jesus’ promise in John 16:13, the
Holy Spirit is guiding believers into all the truth. And as it relates to our
own hearts, praying into the news can relieve the frustration that mere fussing
would only have aggravated. Looks like redemption to me.
You won’t be able to escape the news for very long. I tried,
and it didn’t turn out well. Better to engage the mind of Christ, Christian –
let it have the lead – and ask: “Whose report will I believe?”
Grace and Peace (and a prayer-nose for news),
John
P.S. For updates on the hostage missionaries in Haiti, see https://christianaidministries.org/updates/haiti-staff-abduction/
No comments:
Post a Comment