Thursday, September 29, 2022

Replacing God, Part 3: Computing Pi

 

Hey, Cobblestone,

     Call me a Trekkie if you will (I’m not), but the theme of a certain episode has stuck with me for fifty-plus years. The starship Enterprise had been hijacked by interstellar bad guys, who pulled off the heist, remotely, by hacking the ship’s computer. Now, here’s where the old guy explains to a younger generation how it used to be. A Star Trek viewer in 1960-something would have seen no dilemma in this plot – pull the plug on Computer, turn the dang thing off, and drive the ship where you want to go. To set up the tension, a new idea had to be introduced, namely that all the ship’s systems – propulsion, nav’s, weapons, comm’s – were integrated through Computer. Now we have a problem. Enterprise is doing loop-de-loops and blasting innocent life forms while the crew sit helplessly in their swivel chairs. Consternation abounds.

     You might think I’m about to go anti-technology here, or at least urge caution about putting all of one’s digital eggs in one basket – and I might have, if I weren’t compelled to do something else instead. Step with me back into Gene Roddenberry’s world for a moment…

     Spock, of course, was the one who found a solution by finding a way to give Computer one command: “Computer, compute Pi to the last decimal place.” Off goes Computer on its impossible task, with no capacity for running the ship’s systems. Opening the book to the section on Manual Mode, Scotty got his engines back, Uhura her comm’s, and Sulu his weapons (or was that Chekov?… remember, I’m no Trekkie). To close out the episode, Spock levels his eyebrows and Kirk swivels around one more time to order a new course – oh, and for the bad guys, a photon torpedo to remember him by (I totally made up that last part).

     In the spirit of the day, I’ll present the solution as the problem. Spock set the computer to a task that would render it useless for its designed purposes. In dealing with the first two humans, the serpent in the garden of Eden did much the same, presenting options that had no basis in reality. With no means to deliver on the deal, he offered God’s place of authority to Adam and Eve – just eat the fruit and you’ll figure it out, wink/wink. Since then, as surprised as anyone that such a silly plan could actually work, the serpent (who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world… Revelation 12:9) has co-opted humans into the scheme – human-on-human deception – which is where we are at the moment.

     From the apostle Paul’s perspective, he had a very specific goal in mind, writing to the Colossian Christians, and that was to cooperate with God in rescuing a segment of humanity from a tendency toward the unreal…

For I want you to know how great a struggle I have for you and for those at Laodicea and for all who have not seen me face to face, that their hearts may be encouraged, being knit together in love, to reach all the riches of full assurance of understanding and the knowledge of God's mystery, which is Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. I say this in order that no one may delude you with plausible arguments. For though I am absent in body, yet I am with you in spirit, rejoicing to see your good order and the firmness of your faith in Christ (Colossians 2:1-5).

     Notice, Paul didn’t waste time cautioning them against outlandish arguments, but plausible ones. What would have been a plausible argument in the first century AD? There were various movements about, and Paul spoke against some; but here’s the deal: Yesterday’s outlandish is today’s plausible.

     I was a kid once. Even then it wasn’t easy. Maybe life was simpler then, but all the big stuff still had to be figured out – who am I, and what the heck am I doing here? As a homely, overweight, pimple-faced teenager, I definitely wanted to be something else. Unreal, invalid options existed then, but not to the extent they do now: add another letter, pile up the adjectives and adverbs. The very arguments that diligent and caring Christians would have sought to counsel against, in times past, now bear the force of civil law – yesterday’s plainly hollow and baseless argument is today’s plausible. And the pace is quickening. If the goal is to derail a person from his or her designed purposes, I’ve encountered no more effective tactic than setting that person to the impossible task of picking something other than his or hers.

     We owe it to one another to cling to reality. And we owe it to anyone who is caught up in “computing Pi”. We’ll have to heed the apostle’s instruction ourselves, to continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel that you heard, which has been proclaimed in all creation under heaven (Colossians 1:23) and to let the peace of Christ rule in (our) hearts, to which indeed (we) were called in one body (3:15). Faithful followers of Jesus are meant to be a lifeline in the swirling chaos of invalid options.

     Mr. Roddenberry had it made: he could turn the plot any way he wanted, could invent a chink in the adversary’s armor and a Spock to strike it. We, on the other hand, deal in what’s already real. We will have to struggle for one another as Paul struggled for the Colossians. Though the world runs headlong in its efforts to replace God and wreck humanity, we mustn’t be drawn into the rush, but rather stand on solid reality, offering a way out of the unreal.

  

Grace and Peace (and phasers set no higher than Stun),

 

John

No comments:

Post a Comment